· 12/13/2002
Yao v. Superior Court
Citations
- 127 Cal. Rptr. 2d 912
- 104 Cal. App. 4th 327
- 2002 Daily Journal DAR 14057
- 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11966
- 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 5142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “declin[ing] plaintiff’s invitation to rewrite section 1030 to provide that ‘plaintiff’ includes cross-complainant”
- cross-complaint defendant—.e., a plaintiff in the original action—cannot make a motion based on Section 1030 because “TS]ection 1030 unambiguously refers only to a ‘plaintiff ”
- “The statute therefore acts to prevent out-of-state residents from filing frivolous lawsuits against California residents.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Charles S. Vogel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.