Skip to main content
· 12/13/2002

Yao v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 127 Cal. Rptr. 2d 912
  • 104 Cal. App. 4th 327
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 14057
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11966
  • 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 5142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “declin[ing] plaintiff’s invitation to rewrite section 1030 to provide that ‘plaintiff’ includes cross-complainant”
  • cross-complaint defendant—.e., a plaintiff in the original action—cannot make a motion based on Section 1030 because “TS]ection 1030 unambiguously refers only to a ‘plaintiff ”
  • “The statute therefore acts to prevent out-of-state residents from filing frivolous lawsuits against California residents.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles S. Vogel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.