Yantai Timken Co., Ltd. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Timken did not apply because it allows “submission of information after a preliminary determination to correct errors of information already on the record,” not “new factual information after Commerce issued the preliminary results”
• “Commerce has broad discretion to establish its own rules governing administrative procedures . . .”
• “Commerce has broad discretion to establish its own rules governing administrative procedures . . .”
• “In order for Commerce to fulfill its mandate to administer the antidumping duty law, including its obligation to calculate accurate dumping margins, it must be permitted to enforce the time frame provided in its regulations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).