Yani Mulyani v. Eric Holder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the petitioner submitted probative evidence in support of his position, but finding that none of it was “sufficient to overcome our standard of review”
• noting that it is the petitioner’s burden to show that the government was unable or unwilling to control the private persecutors
• noting that express language of 8 U.S.C. §' 1158(a)(3) (2012) prevents review of IJ’s finding that applicant did not establish changed or extraordinary circumstances
• noting that express language of § 1158(a)(3) prevents review of IJ’s finding that applicant did not establish changed or extraordinary circumstances
• noting that the express language of 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) prevents appellate review of the immigration judge’s factual finding that applicant did not establish changed or extraordinary circumstances
• noting that the express language of 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) prevents appellate review of the immigration judge’s factual finding that applicant did not establish changed or extraordinary circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).