Skip to main content
· 5/9/1963

Yanes v. Irizarry

Citations

  • 217 F. Supp. 57
  • 1963 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the plaintiffs’ unjust enrichment claim where “[t]here is no evidence to establish that any of [the] named plaintiffs conferred a benefit directly to [the defendant]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nazario, Ruiz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.