Yancy v. Cain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[sjummary judgment is not appropriate if there is a genuine factual dispute relating to whether the defendants committed acts that allegedly violated clearly established rights”
• primary violation element of a Section 20(a) claim was satisfied where plaintiffs adequately pleaded Section 10(b) claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).