Skip to main content
· 8/3/2011

Yancick v. Hanna Steel Corp.

Citations

  • 653 F.3d 532
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15896
  • 94 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,249
  • 112 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1537
  • 2011 WL 3319568

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that supervisor’s testimony that a certain employee was a racist was a lay opinion
  • noting that summary judgment may not be granted against the nonmovant when she fails to file a response “as some kind of sanction”
  • noting that the same analysis applies to Title VII and Section 1981 hostile work environment claims
  • noting that hostile work environment claims under section 1981 are analyzed “in the same manner as claims brought pursuant to Title VII”
  • holding no discrimination where coworker’s hostile and aggressive attitude was not linked to a racial animus
  • holding no discrimination where coworker’s hostile and aggressive No. 22-1593 11 attitude was not linked to racial animus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Williams, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.