Skip to main content
· 12/4/2007

Yan v. Mukasey

Citations

  • 509 F.3d 63
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 27929
  • 2007 WL 4233379

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “a finding of inherent implausibility must be based on more than bald speculation or caprice” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • recognizing that an IJ may rely on inherently implausible testimony particularly if the finding is “tethered to record evidence”
  • recognizing that adverse credibility determination may be based on inherent implausibility in applicant’s story if “finding is tethered to record evidence” or based on common sense
  • recognizing that an adverse credibility determination may be based on the inherent implausibility in an applicant’s story when the implausibility finding was “tethered to record evidence”
  • recognizing that an adverse credibility determination may be based on inherent implausibility in the applicant’s story so long as the implausibility “finding is tethered to record evidence”
  • recognizing that adverse credibility determination may be based on inherent implausibility in applicant’s story if the “finding is tethered to record evidence” or based on common sense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calabresi, Raggi, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.