Skip to main content
· 2/24/1984

Yalanzon v. Citibank (South Dakota) N. A.

Citations

  • 315 S.E.2d 677
  • 169 Ga. App. 961
  • 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff “could conceivably recover for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress” if he could show defendant made several harassing phone calls with the intention of causing emotional distress
  • consumer’s affidavits alleging that he had not been credited with various payments made on an account were sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact as to the actual balance due
  • consumer’s affidavits alleging that he had not been credited with various payments made on an account were sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact as to the actual balance due
  • creditor was not entitled to summary judgment on its claim on account where debtor averred in affidavit that the amount of debt claimed by the creditor was wrong and included with the affidavit copies of checks paid to the creditor during the relevant period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Banke, Shulman, Pope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.