YAKAMA INDIAN NATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Eleventh Amendment bars suits against state or its agencies unless state unequivocally consents to waiver of immunity
• holding the Ex Parte Young 5 ||doctrine allows for prospective injunctive relief against state officials named in their 6 || official capacity
• setting forth standard of review and explaining denial of leave to amend is warranted if amendment “would cause prejudice to the opposing party . . . or creates undue delay”
• setting forth standard of review and explaining that denial of leave to amend is warranted if amendment “would cause prejudice to the opposing party . . . or creates undue delay”
• “We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s refusal to grant leave to amend after a responsive pleading has been filed.”
• “The Eleventh Amendment bars suits against a state or its agencies, regardless of the relief sought[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).