Skip to main content
· 11/5/1987

Yaeger v. Stith Equipment Co.

Citations

  • 364 S.E.2d 48
  • 185 Ga. App. 315
  • 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the law of the case to an issue about which no new evidence was presented on the renewed motion for summary judgment
  • applying the law of the case to an issue about which no new evidence was presented on the renewed motion for summary judgment
  • additional affidavits submitted in second motion for summary judgment showed indisputably defendant was not a manufacturer of the defective product; rule inapplicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Banke, Car, Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.