Yadav v. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the SEC’s IAA claim was not rendered fatally defective by the fact that clients were under the de facto control of the broker-dealer co-owner
• holding that Morrison \did not purport to overturn the universally accepted principle that § 10(b) applies with equal force to market manipulation on national exchanges and the domestic over-the-counter market\
• holding that Morrison “did not purport to overturn the universally accepted principle that § 10(b) applies with equal force to market manipulation on national exchanges and the domestic over-the-counter market”
• holding that Morrison “did not purport to overturn the universally accepted principle that § 10(b) applies with equal force to market manipulation on national exchanges and the domestic over-the-counter market”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).