Yadav v. Brookhaven National Laboratory

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• similarly concluding, “the States’ [physician-patient] privilege laws pose no obstacle to the discovery of [patient] medical records, provided those records are de-identified.”
• HIPAA “makes clear that to the extent state privilege laws are more protective of de-identified health information than is HIPAA, those laws are preempted by HIPAA’s regulatory scheme.”
• “[D]e-identified health information is not protected under HIPAA[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).