Skip to main content
· 4/16/1997

Yaba v. Roosevelt

Citations

  • 961 F. Supp. 611
  • 8 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 815
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5165
  • 1997 WL 189036

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that retaliation claims existing but not brought in an earlier lawsuit are precluded by res judicata
  • holding plaintiffs second complaint barred because an allegation of hostile work environment includes claims of an ongoing pattern
  • “Finality for the purposes of res judicata is not as strict as the requirements of finality for the purposes of bringing an appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koeltl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.