Y. M. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that oral and written reprimands received under progressive discipline system did not constitute adverse employment action where they did not implicate any tangible job consequences
• holding that neither “unfavorable performance evaluations” nor “oral or written reprimands” constitute adverse employment actions under our case law
• holding that an adverse action must negatively alter material terms and conditions of employment
• finding that written reprimands received under progressive discipline policy were not adverse employment actions
• explaining that a statement’s “temporal proximity” to the adverse action “is often crucial” when determining whether statement qualified as direct evidence of discrimi‐ nation
• indicating that a negative evaluation is not an adverse employment action where the plaintiff has not shown that the evaluation caused an “immediate” or “inevitable” consequence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).