Xuelin Zhuang v. Datacard Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a transfer from a “developer position” to a “tester position” was not an adverse employment action because the employee’s “pay and benefits remained the same” and she simply preferred “one position over the other”
• stating “a transfer involving only minor changes in working conditions and no reduction in pay or benefits does not constitute an adverse employment action”
• finding no adverse employment action when employer assigned a mentor and provided negative feedback about job performance because plaintiff introduced no evidence that these methods were anything more than benefits designed to give her a chance to improve
• “With regard to facts permitting an inference of discrimination, we find none. . . . We require probative evidence of intentional discrimination, not mere allegations based upon facts that as a matter of law are insufficient to establish discrimination.”
• applying the burden- shifting framework
• just over one month insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).