Xu v. Gay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that this Court was unable to consider the merits of the plaintiff’s proposed amended complaint because the plaintiff never moved for leave to amend
• stating that “[e]vidence of ordinary negligence does not create a question of fact regarding gross negligence”
• defining “gross negligence” as “conduct so reckless as to demonstrate a substantial lack of concern for whether an injury results”
• collecting other examples of statutes in which the Court has adopted the GTLA’s definition
• “A contract is ambiguous only if its language is reasonably susceptible to more than one interpretation.”
• “A contract is ambiguous only if its language is reasonably susceptible to more than one interpretation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).