Xu v. Board of Trustees of the University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “bare allegations of a policy or custom” are not sufficient to satisfy the showing of a widespread practice
• dismissing ICFA claim against Sheriff’s Deputy who evicted individuals because his conduct did not touch on trade or commerce under ICFA
• dismissing Monell claim because “Nile single incident that Plaintiff successfully alleges is not sufficient to satisfy the requirements to plead a Monell claim under Twombly and Iqbal”
• denying immunity to an officer who evicted the wrong person: “Simply because an officer is executing a court order . . . does not necessarily mean that he is automatically immunized from all conduct he engages in while executing that court order.”
• “[B]y alleging ‘widespread practices,’ ‘customs,’ and ‘unofficial policies,’ Plaintiff merely states boilerplate legal conclusions that are the elements of her Monell claim.”
• “[B]y alleging ‘widespread practices,’ ‘customs,’ and ‘unofficial policies,’ plaintiff merely states boilerplate legal conclusions that are the elements of her Monell claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).