Skip to main content
· 7/23/2013

Xtreme Coil Drilling Corp. v. Encana Oil & Gas, Inc.

Citations

  • 958 F. Supp. 2d 1238
  • 2013 WL 3810861

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that common issues predominate when “the only individualized inquiry pertains to the calculation of damages”
  • “[C]ourts routinely certify classes in cases such 5 as this, in which the alleged misconduct occurs in the form of a standardized writing by a 6 common defendant.”
  • “A plaintiff need possess no more than marginal familiarity with the facts of his case, and need not fully understand the legal theories, particularly when he or she is represented by competent counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krieger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.