XPX Armor & Equip., Inc. v. SkyLIFE Co., Inc.
Citations
- 158 N.E.3d 1024
- 2020 Ohio 4498
Syllabus
Genuine issue of material fact existed concerning whether appellant performed under Supply Agreement. Trial court improperly engaged in fact-finding by accepting appellee's factual assertions and rejecting appellant's. Averment in affidavit should have been disregarded where it contradicted deposition testimony. Statement by consultant engineer was non-hearsay under Evid.R. 801(D)(2)(d). Promissory-estoppel claim barred where valid and enforceable contract governed parties' legal relationship.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.