· 12/21/1995
XL Disposal Corp. v. John Sexton Contractors Co.
Citations
- 659 N.E.2d 1312
- 213 Ill. Dec. 665
- 168 Ill. 2d 355
- 1995 Ill. LEXIS 220
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an agreement in which one party promised to make monthly payments to the other party’s attorney as part of an asset sale contract was for the direct benefit of the attorney
- holding that an agreement in which one party promised to make monthly payments to the other party’s attorney as part of an asset sale contract was for the direct benefit of the attorney
- finding that an attorney who was not a named party to a contract was an intended third-party beneficiary because the contract specified he would receive payments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Freeman, Bilandic, Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.