Skip to main content
· 9/6/1994

Xiu Qin Chen v. Slattery

Citations

  • 862 F. Supp. 814
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13468
  • 1994 WL 518996

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the severe repression of the applicant during China’s “Cultural Revolution” constitut- ed persecution
  • stating that “a rebuttable presumption arises that an alien who has been persecuted in the past by his country’s govern- ment has reason to fear similar persecution in the future”
  • granting relief to the son of a Christian minister who was subjected to atrocious persecution, including burns to his body, house arrest, and a prohibition on school attendance
  • relying on Vilorio-Lopez v. INS, 852 F.2d 1137, 1141 (9th Cir. 1988), for the propo- sition that an Immigration Judge must underpin adverse credibility findings with “a ‘specific, cogent reason’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sifton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.