XIU HONG LI
Citations
- 21 I. & N. Dec. 13
Syllabus
XIU HONG LI, BENEFICIARY OF VISA PETITION FILED BY BAO YI XU, 21 I&N Dec. 13 (BIA 1995) ID 3244 (PDF) (1) If the provisions of section 101(b)(1)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(b)(1)(E) (1988), have been invoked in order to obtain or confer an immigration benefit by virtue of an adoptive relationship, the natural relationship will not thereafter be recognized for immigration purposes even if it is established that the adoptive relationship has been legally terminated. (2) A natural parent-child relationship can again be recognized for immigration purposes following the legal termination of an adoption meeting the requirements of section 101(b)(1)(E) of the Act if the petitioner can establish the following four criteria: (1) that no immigration benefit was obtained or conferred through the adoptive relationship, (2) that a natural parent-child relationship meeting the requirements of section 101(b) of the Act once existed, (3) that the adoption has been lawfully terminated under applicable law, and (4) that the natural relationship has been reestablished by law.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing, on appeal, evidence regarding the legal effect of the termination of adoption in China
- remanding proceedings after evaluating new evidence that was submitted on appeal. “Ordinarily, we would not consider evidence first offered on appeal. However, in this instance the issue to which this evidence pertains was understandably not focused on below. ...”
- adoption severed relationship with natural parents
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ramirez-Alejandre v. AshcroftNinth Circuit· 2003-02-13· cited 108×
- Ramon Ramirez-Alejandre v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2003-02-14· cited 65×
- Ramon Ramirez-Alejandre v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States of AmericaNinth Circuit· 2002-01-09· cited 10×
- Kosak v. DevineE.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-07-12· cited 1×
- Kosak v. Dir BCISThird Circuit· 2008-03-06· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- SORIANOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1988-07-01· cited 41×
- LIBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1993-07-01· cited 8×
- KONGBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1979-07-01· cited 8×
- LUMBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1964-07-01· cited 4×
- BBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1960-07-01· cited 3×
- KIRBYBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1969-07-01· cited 2×
- VALSAMAKISBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1967-07-01· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.