Xing Qiang Zhuo v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a detailed summary was sufficient to overcome the presumption of prejudice flowing from the substantial omission of a discussion between military judge and the appellant
• affirming both findings and discharge because government summarization of substantial omission regarding sentence announcement was so meticulously accomplished as to rebut presumption of prejudice
• noting also that “[a]t this stage of the trial, where testimony and legal rulings are not involved, the substance, rather than the exact words uttered by the judge, was critical to the accused’s rights.”
• military judge’s rationale on sentence adjudged and recommended suspension are not insubstantial matters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).