Skip to main content
· 2/24/2004

Xin Jie Xie v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States

Citations

  • 359 F.3d 239
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 3488
  • 2004 WL 333664

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the omission of a material event from an asylum application may support an adverse credibility finding
  • explaining that the omission of a key event from an alien’s written asylum application can support an adverse cred- ibility finding
  • concluding that alien’s varying reports that he was detained after the birth of his second or third child was material because “[h]e purported to be able to tie the date of his detention to a particular event”
  • stating that the BIA can rely upon State Department reports that are vague and ambiguous
  • noting that minor inconsistencies do not provide an adequate basis for an adverse credibility finding
  • explaining that an adverse credibility finding must be upheld unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Roth, Stapleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.