Skip to main content
· 2/20/2008

Ximines v. George Wingate High School

Citations

  • 516 F.3d 156
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 3494
  • 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,110
  • 102 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1284
  • 2008 WL 441801

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing plaintiffs § 1983 claims against the Department of Corrections as a threshold matter, since it is a non-suable entity
  • affirming district court’s ruling that a New York City public school is not a suable entity
  • “The central question is whether the complaint filed with the EEOC gave that agency ‘adequate notice to investigate discrimination on both bases.”
  • “Section 396 of the Charter has been construed to mean that New York City departments, as distinct from the City itself, lack the capacity to be sued.”
  • “Section 396 of the Charter has been construed to mean that New York City departments, as distinct from the City itself, lack the capacity to be sued.”
  • in determining the scope of a charge for purposes of piggybacking, the Court must look at the factual allegations describing the discrimination about which the claimant is complaining

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pooler, Livingston, Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.