Xilinx, Inc. v. Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “we cannot apply Muniz via a plea enforcement theory, as the parties could not structure the plea to accommodate law that did not exist”
• stating that “we cannot apply Muniz via a plea enforcement theory, as the parties could not structure the plea to accommodate law that did not exist”
• stating generally that plea enforcement theory is unavailable as ground for collateral relief if there is no plea bargain to enforce
• stating generally that plea enforcement theory is unavailable as ground for collateral relief if there is no plea bargain to enforce
• stating generally that plea enforcement theory is unavailable as ground for collateral relief if there is no plea bargain to enforce
• stating generally that plea enforcement theory is unavailable as ground for collateral relief if there is no plea bargain to enforce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).