Xiao Qing Ni v. Attorney General of United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that under Fourth Circuit precedent regarding sanctions for frivolous filings under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, “advice of counsel in integral to the calculus of sanctions”
• “[Plaintiff’s] complaint also alleged a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, however he appears to have abandoned this claim by failing to address it in his response to Sprint’s motion for summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).