Xiao Feng Lin v. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• following United States v. Mandujano, 425 U.S. 564, 96 S.Ct. 1768, 48 L.Ed.2d 212 (1976), and Glickstein v. United States, supra, in applying Article 31(d)
• following United States v. Madujano , 425 U.S. 564 (1976), and Glickstein v. United States , supra , in applying Article 31(d)
• noting in dicta that a person who chooses to testify falsely rather than asserting the privilege against self-incrimination can be prosecuted for perjury regardless of whether the statement would be admissible with respect to another offense
• noting in dicta that a person who chooses to testify falsely rather than asserting the privilege against self-incrimination can be prosecuted for perjury regardless of whether the statement would be admissible with respect to another offense
• Rights under Article 31 offer “broader protection than the Fifth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).