Skip to main content
· 2/7/2008

Xian Liang Zeng v. Mukasey

Citations

  • 263 F. App'x 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the government failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that members were not selected for the improper purpose of avoiding lenient sentences
  • noting that “courts- martial have never been considered subject to the jury-trial demands of the Constitu- tion”
  • noting that “courts-martial have never been considered subject to the jury-trial demands of the Constitution”
  • noting that “courts- 3 United States v. Martinez, No. ACM 39903 (f rev
  • rejecting systematic exclusion of junior officers and enlisted members in pay grade E-6 and below to avoid light sentences
  • rejecting the systematic exclusion of junior officers and enlisted members in pay grade E-6 and below for the improper purpose of avoiding lenient sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.