Xerox Corporation v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]he existence of a protestable decision of the type enumerated in 19 U.S.C. § 1514 (a) is a condition precedent for jurisdiction to lie in the Court of International Trade under section 1581(a).\
• “[A]n im- porter cannot use section 10.112 to circumvent the clear mandate of NAFTA and 19 U.S.C. § 1520(d) that allows an importer only one year to file a claim in the first in- stance for NAFTA treatment.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).