Xerox Corp. v. Apple Computer, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that competitor could state UCL claim where “there is a likelihood of consumer confusion as to source or sponsorship”
• “An untimely motion to dismiss is treated as a motion for judgment on the pleadings.”
• “Apple’s 14 suit against Microsoft and Hewlett-Packard alone cannot reasonably be viewed as giving 15 rise to an ‘apprehension of liability on Xerox’ part, since the defendants therein have no 16 relationship to Xerox . . . .”
• relying on Sherwood Medical 19 Industries, Inc.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).