X-L Liquors, Inc. v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that dismissal pursuant to statute of limitations “would effectively defeat the plaintiffs action without any determination whatever on the ultimate merits — a result wholly inconsistent with the principles underlying our new judicial structure”
• stating that dismissal pursuant to statute of limitations \would effectively defeat the plaintiff's action without any determination whatever on the ultimate merits — a result wholly inconsistent with the principles underlying our new judicial structure\
• Director may adopt regulations pertaining to the liquor industry even when they deal with subjects not specifically mentioned in the Alcoholic Beverage Law
• after ineffective first attempt at service, the delay in proceeding with the second service did not prejudice the non-delinquent party and, consequently, action was not dismissed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).