Wyss v. Inskeep

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that some kinds of bonuses constitute “wages”
• rejecting argument that a company's discretion over a bonus plan renders the plan's promises illusory
• “All that was necessary was that the terms of the plan were capable of ascertainment and that plaintiff knew that there was a plan.”
• employer could not modify a bonus plan after employee had qualified “in the absence of a clear statement in the bonus plan of the right to do so”
• compensation for services includes fringe benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).