Wynne v. Loyola University of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that summary judgment for the defendant was proper where the plaintiff admitted the underlying facts that formed the basis for the defendant’s opinion
• finding that \[f]ailure to comply with Rule 191(b) defeats an objection on appeal that insufficient time for discovery was allowed\
• finding that allegations in a “general sense” of what relevant information proposed witnesses would provide for the plaintiff’s claim was not sufficient to show compliance with Rule 191(b)
• finding that allegations in a “general sense” of what relevant information proposed witnesses would provide for the plaintiff’s claim was not sufficient to show compliance with Rule 191(b)
• explaining that non-actionable statements typically contain no “objectively verifiable factual assertion”
• noting that “substantial truth” is a defense to defamation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).