Skip to main content

Wynne v. Creigle

Citations

  • 63 Mass. App. Ct. 246
  • 825 N.E.2d 559
  • 22 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1274
  • 2005 Mass. App. LEXIS 362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that defendant’s statements to media were “mirror images” of other admittedly protected statements made in course of governmental investigation
  • finding that statements made to the media that were mirror images of protected statements and were made about an issue already under review were sufficiently “in connection with” a pending review as to be protected under the anti-SLAPP statute
  • describing Creigle's statements as \mere repetition[s]\ of those she had already made during the underlying investigation of the plaintiff
  • \[Statements] were essentially mirror images of those she made during and 'in connection with' the departmental investigation of the plaintiff\ [emphasis added]
  • fire fighter’s widow made statements to press that were “essentially mirror images” of statements made at disciplinary hearing during investigation of plaintiff and therefore her statements were petitioning activity
  • defendant’s statements to the press concerned an issue already under consideration by two governmental bodies and were mirror images of what was said in a governmental forum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.