Wynn v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the joint employer test in the ADEA context but 2 noting that it applies equally to FEHA
• finding that even where Rule 20 requirements for joinder are satisfied, the court may 23 exercise its discretion “to sever for at least two reasons: (1) to prevent jury confusion and judicial 24 inefficiency, and (2) to prevent unfair prejudice to the [defendants]”
• finding that even where Rule 20 requirements for joinder are satisfied, the court may 28 exercise its discretion “to sever for at least two reasons: (1) to prevent jury confusion and judicial 1 inefficiency, and (2) to prevent unfair prejudice to the [defendants]”
• finding that even where Rule 20 requirements for joinder are satisfied, the court may 21 exercise its discretion “to sever for at least two reasons: (1) to prevent jury confusion and judicial 22 inefficiency, and (2) to prevent unfair prejudice to the [defendants]”
• finding that even where Rule 20 requirements for joinder are satisfied, the court may 19 exercise its discretion “to sever for at least two reasons: (1) to prevent jury confusion and judicial 20 inefficiency, and (2) to prevent unfair prejudice to the [defendants]”
• finding that even where Rule 20 requirements for joinder are satisfied, the 27 Court may exercise its discretion “to sever for at least two reasons: (1) to prevent jury confusion 28 and judicial inefficiency, and (2) to prevent unfair prejudice to the [defendants]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).