Wyman v. Kilgore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The jury is not required to find facts that are not elements of the offense, such as the location of the crime for venue purposes.”
• multiple counts of possession of child pornography permitted where evidence showed defendant obtained possession of images at different times and places
• “[It] is possible for a defendant to be convicted of multiple counts of possession of child pornography if the [S]tate can show the defendant came into possession of the pornographic materials at different times or from different sources.”
• “abuse of discretion [occurs] when it is clearly against the logic of the circumstances then before the court, and is so unreasonable and arbitrary that it shocks the sense of justice and indicates a lack of careful, deliberate consideration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).