Skip to main content

Citations

  • 30 F. Cas. 723
  • 1 Story 273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that one cannot patent the “art of cutting ice by means of any power, other than human power,” because it was “a claim for an art or principle in the abstract, and not for any particular method or machinery, by which ice can be cut”
  • finding ineligible a claim to “the art of cutting ice by means of any power, other than human power”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Story

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.