WYDA Associates v. Merner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a “trial court’s determination of whether an ambiguity exists is a question of law”; adding that a “trial court’s resolution of an ambiguity is also a question of law if no parol evidence is admitted or if the parol evidence is not in conflict”
• “Parol or extrinsic evidence is admissible to resolve an ambiguity.”
• applying Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 in this context
• line breaks inserted for readability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).