Skip to main content
· 3/7/2003

Wyatt v. Estate of Wyatt

Citations

  • 65 P.3d 825
  • 2003 Alas. LEXIS 18
  • 2003 WL 1192824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We have repeatedly held that the pendency of an appeal is irrelevant for the purposes of res judicata and collateral estop-pel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Chief Justice, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, and Carpeneti, Justices

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.