WWBITV, INC. v. Village of Rouses Point

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because we conclude that there was no violation of the plaintiffs’ constitutional rights, we do not reach the issue[ ] of qualified immunity[.]”
• “[G]iven the eventual dismissal of all of plaintiffs' federal claims, we find that the district court acted well within its discretion in declining to assert supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs' state-law claim.”
• “where an adequate post-deprivation process exists, an official reasonably believing on the basis of competent evidence that there is an emergency does not effect a constitutional violation by” taking action “without notice or a hearing”
• plaintiffs learned of the 27 demolition from a friend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).