Wutzke v. Schwaegler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Washington's product liability law contains \`requirements of general app liability where the purpose of the requirement relates ... to other procedures in addition to devices'\
• stating that Washington’s product liability law contains “ ‘requirements of general applicability where the purpose of the requirement relates ... to other procedures in addition to devices’ ”
• “The general consensus is that the rigorous process of the PMA results in approval of a device’s design that rises to the level of specific federal requirements.”
• state strict liability claims not preempted by MDA because they did not establish additional or different requirements specific to medical devices
• state strict liability claims not preempted by MDA because they did not establish additional or different requirements specific to medical devices
• state strict liability claims not preempted by MDA because they did not establish additional or different requirements specific to medical devices

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).