Skip to main content
· 7/29/1997

Wussler v. Silva (In Re Silva)

Citations

  • 215 B.R. 73
  • 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 2201
  • 1997 WL 710645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing since 30-day extension of time provided under 11 U.S.C. § 108(c)(2) was prior in time to date judgment expired under California statute, § 108(c
  • calculating § 108(c)'s effect on the time to renew a California judgment in the same fashion as this decision
  • observing since 30-day extension of time provided under 11 U.S.C. § 108(c)(2) was pri- or in time to date judgment expired under California statute, § 108(c
  • the filing of an application for renewal of judgment pursuant to California law is not a violation of the automatic stay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jim D. Pappas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.