Skip to main content
· 10/11/1929

Wurts-Dundas v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 17 B.T.A. 881
  • 1929 BTA LEXIS 2227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “plaintiffs cannot evade … the lack of a Congressionally authorized right of action [to enforce a federal statute]” by invoking state-law injunction claim
  • “plaintiffs cannot evade … the lack of a Congressionally authorized right of action [to enforce a federal statute]” by invoking state-law injunction claim
  • no private right of 4 action under federal perjury statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1621
  • no private right of action under 18 U.S.C. § 1621

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morkis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.