· 10/11/1929
Wurts-Dundas v. Commissioner
Citations
- 17 B.T.A. 881
- 1929 BTA LEXIS 2227
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “plaintiffs cannot evade … the lack of a Congressionally authorized right of action [to enforce a federal statute]” by invoking state-law injunction claim
- “plaintiffs cannot evade … the lack of a Congressionally authorized right of action [to enforce a federal statute]” by invoking state-law injunction claim
- no private right of 4 action under federal perjury statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1621
- no private right of action under 18 U.S.C. § 1621
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morkis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.