Skip to main content
· 7/3/1984

Wunschel v. City of Jersey City

Citations

  • 477 A.2d 329
  • 96 N.J. 651
  • 1984 N.J. LEXIS 2681

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an employee is not bound by a finding of employment status between the employer and coemployee
  • concluding the filing of a workers’ compensation petition did not demonstrate substantial compliance because it did not give notice of intention to assert wrongful death claim against public entity
  • stating the \joint 17 A-1156-14T4 employer doctrine\ may be used to establish \employment status for the purposes of workers' compensation\
  • stating, “Central to the application of the doctrine [of collateral estoppel] is that the party against whom the doctrine is to be invoked must have been party to or privy to the prior proceedings.”
  • stating, “Central to the application of the doctrine [of collateral estoppel] is that the party against whom the doctrine is to be invoked must have been party to or privy to the prior proceedings.”
  • employee not bound by finding of employment status as to co-employee when employer’s interest may be opposed to employee’s

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Hern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.