Skip to main content
· 6/10/2005

Wuhan Bee Healthy Co., Ltd. v. United States

Citations

  • 374 F. Supp. 2d 1299
  • 29 Ct. Int'l Trade 587
  • 29 C.I.T. 587
  • 27 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1831
  • 2005 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 67

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Commerce gives “no reason[ ] as to why imported coal provides the best surrogate value.”
  • quot ing Geum Poong Corp. v. United States, 26 CIT 322, 326, 193 F. Supp. 2d 1363, 1369 (2002)
  • “Although ... Commerce does not have an ‘unconditional preference’ for using domestic prices over import prices when valuing surrogates, ... it must provide an explanation that reasonably supports its decision.”
  • Commerce justified in selecting financial statement when alternative contained irregularities and discrepancies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eaton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.