· 1/12/1984
Wsm, Incorporated v. Dennis E. Hilton and Country Shindig Opry, Inc.
Citations
- 724 F.2d 1320
- 221 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 410
- 14 Fed. R. Serv. 1491
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 26512
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that whether a mark is generic, descriptive, suggestive, arbitrary or fanciful is generally a factual issue
- “Since ‘opry’ is not an arbitrary, coined or fanciful term, it is not a distinctive mark entitled to protection under the Missouri anti-dilution statute.”
- “How a particular word has been used and how it has been understood by the public is a question of fact.”
- “The correct categorization of a given term is also a factual issue.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gibson, Fagg, Woods
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.