Skip to main content
· 5/7/2008

WRONCY v. Klemp

Citations

  • 184 P.3d 1133
  • 219 Or. App. 578
  • 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he party challenging the exclusion [of evidence] must show that the exclusion affected a substantial right, that is, that the excluded evidence could have affected the outcome of the trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Rosenblum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.