· 5/7/2008
WRONCY v. Klemp
Citations
- 184 P.3d 1133
- 219 Or. App. 578
- 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 597
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he party challenging the exclusion [of evidence] must show that the exclusion affected a substantial right, that is, that the excluded evidence could have affected the outcome of the trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Rosenblum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.