Skip to main content

Wright v. Wright

Citations

  • 118 N.E.2d 280
  • 2 Ill. 2d 246
  • 1954 Ill. LEXIS 334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing trial court and holding that plaintiff established a resulting trust, where plaintiff paid no part of the purchase price of the house but did pay $206 up front for the painting of the house, as mandated by the sale contract, and paid the monthly mortgage payments
  • reversing trial court and holding that plaintiff established a resulting trust, where plaintiff paid no part of the purchase price of the house but did pay $206 up front for the painting of the house, as mandated by the sale contract, and paid the monthly mortgage payments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: C.E. Tate

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.