Wright v. Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the date the dissolution proceeding was instituted is dispositive for determining whether Ball is applicable, not the date of conveyance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Claughton v. Claughton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-01-14· cited 7×
• Wright v. Wright
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-02-23· cited 2×
• Farah v. Farah
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-11· cited 2×
• Bayliss v. Bayliss
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-07-14· cited 2×
• Bayliss v. Bayliss
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-06· cited 1×
• Siegel v. Siegel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-12

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ball v. Ball
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1976-06-30· cited 157×
• Laws v. Laws
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-11-08· cited 19×
• Wright v. Wright
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-10-08· cited 11×
• Hart v. Hart
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-11-28· cited 11×
• Parramore v. Parramore
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-12-12· cited 7×